Endoscopic Findings in Patients with Dyspepsia in Iran

Ghamar-Chehreh ME1, Shahverdi E2,3*, Khedmat H1, Ghafoorian A1 and Amini M1

1Baqiyatalah Research Center for Gastroenterology and Liver Disease, Baqiyatallah University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran

2Blood Transfusion Research Center/High Institute for Research Center and Education in Transfusion Medicine, Immunohematology Department, Tehran, Iran

3Student Research Committee, Baqiyatallah University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran

*Corresponding Author:
Shahverdi E
Blood Transfusion Research Centre/High Institute for Research Centre and Education in Transfusion Medicine, Immunohematology Department, Tehran, Iran
Tel: +982188601606
E-mail: [email protected]

Received Date: September 5, 2016; Accepted Date: September 24, 2016; Published Date: September 30, 2016

Citation: Ghamar-Chehreh ME, Shahverdi E, Khedmat H, et al. Endoscopic Findings in Patients with Dyspepsia in Iran. Int J Dig Dis. 2016, 2:3. doi:10.4172/2472-1891.100030

Copyright: © 2016 Ghamar-Chehreh ME, et al. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

 
Visit for more related articles at Global Journal of Digestive Diseases

Abstract

Background: It is necessary to know the causes of dyspepsia to establish the therapeutic approach. Dyspepsia is a frequent syndrome our country, while there are restrictions to endoscopy and high prevalence of Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori) infection. This study was conducted to evaluate the endoscopic findings of the syndrome, in an outpatient screening clinic of the Baqiyatallah Hospital in Tehran, Iran.

Material and methods: Between 20 March and 20 November 2015 and according to Rome III criteria, outpatients with uninvestigated dyspepsia, answered Dyspepsia Hong Kong Index Questionnaire and underwent esophagogastroduodenoscopy. The Rapid Urease Test was applied to fragments of the antral mucosa, and epidemiological data were collected from the studied population. Normal endoscopic findings were analyzed with different variables to verify statistically significant associations.

Results: Eventually 400 patients (57.5% males and 42.5% females) with the mean age of 51.32±17.98 years were evaluated. About 55% of them were smokers and 45% used NSAID. H. pylori (80%) were the most endoscopic findings between Endoscopic findings. Among positive and negative H. pylori patients, 56.25% and 50% were smokers respectively. All patients with gastric adenocarcinoma (100%) and 13.2% patients without gastric adenocarcinoma were with fundus, body or antrum ulcer.

Conclusions: Predominance of functional disease was showed in our setting by the endoscopic diagnosis of uninvestigated dyspepsia. Although the prevalence of H. pylori was high, cancer was an uncommon finding.

Keywords

Dyspepsia; Helicobacter pylori; Endoscopy; Adenocarcinoma

Introduction

Dyspepsia is a prevalent complaint in general and gastrointestinal clinics [1-6], with a prevalence of up to about 30% among adults in Iran [7]. Dyspepsia is a complex condition, including upper gastrointestinal tract with chronic and recurrent symptoms, including epigastric pain, discomfort, including postprandial fullness and early satiety, which may overlap with heartburn and regurgitation [6,8]. The symptoms of dyspepsia could be occurred due to an important structural pathology such as chronic peptic ulcer disease, gastroesophageal reflux, malignancy or it can also present as functional dyspepsia (without evidence of organic cause). Over 80% of the population are affected by dyspepsia at some time in their life [9] Worldwide investigations have shown that the prevalence of dyspepsia is in the range of 14.5-45% [2,10-13].

Only 75% of the dyspepsia experts, 73% of gastroenterologists and 59% of primary care providers adhere to dyspepsia best practices; so different medics have different views of dyspepsia. Providing of adequate treatment following common dyspepsia guidelines without a common diagnostic language may be unable [14]. Comparing the prevalence rate of dyspepsia in different time periods or places is almost impossible due to the quick presentation of dyspepsia diagnostic criteria [15]. Due to structural upper gastrointestinal (UGI) tract diseases like peptic ulcer, erosive esophagitis, luminal strictures and malignancy in structural dyspepsia esophagogastroduodenoscopy is the method of choice in differential diagnosis between structural and functional dyspepsia. It is possible that endoscopy is considered as the first approach in dyspepsia [16] the establishment of this procedure for every dyspeptic patient may not be a practical approach because it has burdensome expenses on health system [17]. It should also be recognized that a large percentage of uninvestigated dyspepsia are functional cases [18]. Therefore the use of endoscopy in uninvestigated dyspepsia is still a controversial subject in the world [19].

Materials and Methods

This prospective, cross-sectional study was carried out between 20 March and 20 November 2015. Four hundred patients, who presented with uninvestigated dyspepsia, were selected using a convenience sampling method in Baqiyatallah Hospital in Tehran, Iran. Dyspepsia Hong Kong Index Questionnaire was completed to evaluate symptoms. Questionnaire form included questions about the severity of 12 findings: Stomach pain, upper abdominal bloating, upper abdominal dull ache, stomach pain before a meal, stomach pain when anxious, vomiting, nausea, belching, acid regurgitation, heartburn, and feeling of acidity in the stomach and loss of appetite. The cut-off point selected was ≥16. The sensitivity at the ≥16 cut-off point was 82% with a specificity of 83% [20]. Dyspepsia is a chronic and recurrent epigastric pain or discomfort (including postprandial fullness and early satiety) with or without heartburn and regurgitation. Patients with gastro-esophageal reflux disease (GERD), predominant symptoms such as heartburn or acid regurgitation alone, inflammatory bowel disease, malignancy or advanced liver disease were excluded from the study.

Endoscopic findings were recorded and to rule out Helicobacter pylori and malignancies, gastric biopsies were incurred.

The endoscopic findings were divided into normal or abnormal. Gastritis, duodenitis, peptic and duodenal ulcer, hiatus hernia, malignancy and others considered as abnormal findings. Upper gastrointestinal (UGI) endoscopy was diagnosed by a gastroenterologist with 10 years of experience.

Ethical considerations

This study was approved by the ethics committee of the Baqiyatallah University of Medical Sciences. Individuals were asked to sign an informed consent form before Endoscopy. All the terms of the Helsinki declaration were considered.

Statistical analysis

Variables were measured as the frequency and percentage, and Fisher’s test was used to determination of the relation between dyspeptic organic findings and the variables, with a pvalue <0.05 being considered statistically significant. Organic dyspeptic findings were analyzed with the variables by simple and multiple binary logistic regressions, and then odd ratios and its 95% confidence intervals were presented. Regression coefficient values were used to determination of score for endoscopy.

Results

Eventually, 400 patients (57.5% males and 42.5% females) with the mean age of 51.32 ± 17.98 years were evaluated. About 55% of them were smokers and 45% used NSAID.

Table 1 shows the description of the symptoms.

Symptoms Onset <6 months 7.50% Symptoms Onset 3-6 years 27.50%
  6-12 months 15%   6-9 years 17.50%
1-3 years 30% >9 years 2.50%
Stomach pain when anxious None 2.50% Vomiting None 72.50%
  Mild 20%   Mild 10%
Moderate 15% Moderate 10%
Severe 12.50% Severe 2.50%
Extreme 50% Extreme 5%
Loss of appetite None 7.50% Nausea None 5%
  Mild 12.50%   Mild 37.50%
Moderate 45% Moderate 37.50%
Severe 12.50% Severe 7.50%
Extreme 22.50% Extreme 12.50%
Upper abdominal bloating Mild 7. 5% Stomach pain Mild 17.50%
  Moderate 40%   Moderate 32.50%
Severe 20% Severe 25%
Extreme 32.50% Extreme 25%
Upper abdominal dull ache Mild 0% Belching Mild 5%
  Moderate 17.50%   Moderate 35%
Severe 55% Severe 42.50%
Extreme 27.50% Extreme 17.5
Stomach pain before meal Mild 10% Heart burn Mild 7.50%
  Moderate 52.50%   Moderate 35%
Severe 27.50% Severe 30%
Extreme 10% Extreme 27.50%
Acid regurgitation Mild 15% Feeling of acidity in stomach Mild 12.50%
  Moderate 20%   Moderate 47.50%
Severe 40% Severe 30%
Extreme 25% Extreme 10%

Table 1: Description of the symptoms.

According to Table 2, positive H. pylori (80%) were the most endoscopic findings between Endoscopic findings. Among positive and negative H. pylori patients, 56.25% and 50% were smokers respectively. There was no statistically significant relation between H. pylori status and smoking (P=0.75).

Normal Endoscopy (35%)
Esophagus Non erosive esophagitis 0%
  Erosive esophagitis 7.50%
Barrett 2.50%
Ulcer 0%
Hiatal Herniation 37.50%
Adenocarcinoma 2.50%
Reflux esophagitis 25%
Others* 2.50%
Stomach
Gastritis Erythematous 17.50%
  Erosive 15%
Nodular 5%
Atrophic 7.50%
Ulcer Fundus,body and antrum 17.50%
  Prepyloric 10%
Malignancy Adenocarcinoma 5%
  Lymphoma 2.50%
Others 0%
Duodenum
Duodenitis Erythematous 17.50%
  Erosive 15%
Ulcer 22.50%
Others 0%

Table 2: Endoscopic findings (*Others esophagus findings: Candidiasis and esophagus varices).

Between positive and negative H. pylori patients 53.1% and 12.5% used NSAID respectively. There was a significant relation between use of NSAID and H. pylori status (P=0.03).

All patients with gastric adenocarcinoma (100%) and 13.2% patients without gastric adenocarcinoma were with fundus, body or antrum ulcer. There was a statistically significant relation between gastric adenocarcinoma and ulcer in fundus, body, and antrum (P<0.01) (Table 3).

Gastric Malignancies Gastric Adenocarcinoma Gastric Lymphoma
Yes No Yes No
Fundus, body or antrum ulcer 100% 13.20% 0% 17.90%
P-value 0.002 0.64
Prepyloric Ulcer 0% 15% 0% 10.30%
P-value 0.62 0.73

Table 3: Gastric malignancies and gastric ulcer.

Discussion

We found that the most patients reported moderate intensity in most symptoms, except belching and acid regurgitation. Positive H. pylori was the most endoscopic finding that showed a significant relation with the use of NSAID (P=0.03). After H. pylori, Gastritis was the most common findings with a prevalence rate of 45%. Prevalence of normal endoscopy in a recent study was 35%. Our study also showed the prevalence of esophageal and gastric malignancies included esophageal adenocarcinoma, gastric adenocarcinoma and gastric lymphoma 2.5%, 5% and 2.5% respectively. We found fundus, body and antrum ulcer of the main cause of gastric adenocarcinoma so that all patients with gastric adenocarcinoma showed fundus, body or antrum ulcers.

Based on Azzam et al. [21] study, the most common abnormal endoscopy findings included

Gastritis (52%) and malignancy rate were about 2.6%. Prevalence of gastritis in Sahin et al. [22] was 48.4%. In Choomsri et al. [23] study, significant endoscopic lesions were found in 7% of the patients in the form of gastric ulcers, and only 1% was diagnosed to have gastric cancer. In a recent study, after H. pylori, Gastritis was the most common findings (45%), but our malignancy rate was higher (10%). These outcomes suggest that in patients complaining of dyspeptic symptoms in general; gastritis may be present and a gastric ulcer may be detected.

Although primary gastrointestinal lymphoma is a rare disease, the stomach is the most frequent site of involvement for this neoplasm [24]. The site of gastrointestinal lymphoma in all of the recent patients was the stomach.

The prevalence of gastro-esophageal reflux has grown seriously in the recent decade. This increase is especially seen in the western world so that the risk of esophageal adenocarcinoma increased in 19-30% of the population [25]. In this study, gastro-esophageal reflux was diagnosed in 25% of patients; that was higher than of the findings of a recent metaanalysis, based on the Rome criteria [18].

Previous studies reported a high frequency of positive H. pylori in Iranian population and also in dyspeptic patients so that 57-91% of Iranians are H. pylori positive [26-29] and about 50% of dyspeptic patients in Shokrzadeh [30] study were with positive H. pylori. Our prevalence rate was 80%. The low availability of non-invasive tests for detection leads to this high prevalence of infection, which prevent the use of the proposed approach of test and treat strategy for undiagnosed dyspepsia. H. pylori eradication treatment always costs highly and is sophisticated. Also, it has a limited efficiency of 88% [31] and according to previous studies; Iran is an endemic area of H. pylori [26].

This study also reported the rate of normal endoscopy about 54%, while this rate in our study was 35% that was near to reported rate of Sahin et al. study (32.9%) [22]. Which means that the majority of our dyspeptic patients had a positive endoscopy. Therefore endoscopic evaluation of dyspeptic patients seems to be necessary. This finding was reported by Sahin et al. [22] too. However, some previous studies reported that most patients with dyspepsia have no detectable abnormality [32,33]. Thus, they did not recommend endoscopic evaluation as an initial step in the management of patients with dyspepsia [34,35].

This study faced with limitations such as relatively small sample size and the small number of significant endoscopic lesions, resulting in difficulties to detect any clinically significant differences. In this study, we insist on the need for international dyspepsia guidelines while doing the upper gastrointestinal endoscopy.

Conclusion

In conclusion, the findings of the present study confirmed selective upper gastrointestinal endoscopy in patients with dyspepsia. In Iran, as a country with high prevalence of H. pylori infection, the most frequent cause of uninvestigated dyspepsia is gastritis, whereas gastric cancer is a rare finding. H. pylori may be associated with chronic gastritis. Further studies are needed to support this relation and to find prognostic markers for the abnormal findings in our patient population.

References

Select your language of interest to view the total content in your interested language

Viewing options

Post your comment

Share This Article

Recommended Conferences

Flyer image
 

Post your comment

captcha   Reload  Can't read the image? click here to refresh